You may be feeling anxious about this section, and you are most definitely not alone in that feeling. Although every PhD dissertation is different, there are some commonalities when starting a conversation: What Is the Purpose of the Discussion Chapter? When writing a PhD thesis, the goal of your discussion chapter is to critically examine your findings and make judgements about what you have learned.
The chapter most likely to provoke fear, uncertainty and doubt. The discussion section is scary because you have to make new knowledge claims of your own, not just agree or disagree with other people. Knowledge claims are like dumplings in the thesis soup or chocolate chips in the PhD cookie.
They Phd thesis discussion chapter evaluate the quality, amount and — most importantly — the believability of your knowledge claims. If you are too speculative you might tip over the believability cliff.
Years ago I wrote a post on how to start the discussion chapter. I gave a few suggestions for generating creative ideas, but not a detailed discussion of how to do any of them.
The post was a useful starting point, but unfortunately not enough to actually help one of my students, Wendy, write her discussion chapters. Like many thesis writers, Wendy has had a long slog with this project and is having trouble seeing the wood for the trees.
Wendy is in the creative arts, so her findings are not in the form of formulas and graphs. The findings are really a series of observations which can be backed up with evidence.
I think we made good progress with a whiteboard in the last meeting and I asked her if I could share what we did with the world, she generously agreed thanks Wendy! The book suggests that you write this list with the help of a sympathetic listener who knows the project, like a supervisor.
Wendy sat in a chair and just talked at me. I wrote what she said on the whiteboard, asking a question now and then to clarify or expand on a point. The whiteboard was an ideal medium for this task. We could both see it and it was easy to rub out stuff. Assess the findings The mud map enabled us to start sorting and organising the ideas.
Wendy still has one data collection round to run so some findings are more speculative than others. I added a few arrows and brackets to connect obviously related statements.
This is a creative process which involves reading over the mud map again and again, writing ideas for over arching themes under which the findings might fit.
After about another 45 minutes of fiddling and arguing about it, we had this provisional list of four themes: We took a couple of photos of the board with my phone and then rubbed it all out.
We put the overall aim of the thesis in the middle of the bubble and put the emergent themes in the first layer of bubbles around it: The third layer of bubbles contained findings from our mud map recorded in the photos on my phone that we thought fell under these themes.
As we wrote the findings into the bubbles we shifted the wording to find shorter ways of saying the same thing and started to blend some of the findings together.
This process enabled us to see how some findings from the mud map might fall under multiple themes, which suggested a satisfactory repetition was emerging.
You know you have a thesis on your hands when you feel like you are saying the same thing over and over, but in a slightly different way every time. This is a stylistic choice — there is no right or wrong way to do it, but the diagram lets you imagine different results and discuss the implications of the various choices.
We took several photos as this diagram evolved and changed to present different options. Make a snowflake At this point I was happy.
I know I can work from a spider diagram, but Wendy was still not comfortable. She is a more creative person than me and was worried that she would muck around and just find more and more connections — a fair point."The length of the 44 thesis conclusions ranged from 2 to 38 pages, averaging pages.
There was a marked difference, however, between those in ST disciplines and those in HSS disciplines. General conclusions and discussion Introduction In this chapter, the main findings with regard to the research questions are summarised and general conclusions based on the findings of the studies presented in this thesis are described.
Furthermore, the strengths and limitations. Get high-quality dissertation discussion help from our Ph.D. and Master's academic writers.
Have them write a dissertation discussion chapter for you. Toll free: The most difficult and time-consuming part of the dissertation is the dissertation discussion or thesis discussion part. In the dissertation discussion and thesis discussion part. Whether you are writing a PhD, Master’s or Undergraduate level dissertation, the discussion chapter (or section in a shorter dissertation) is going to be one of the most influential.
This section is all about how you have 1) answered your research questions and 2) . In this chapter, the main findings with regard to the research questions are summarised and general conclusions based on the findings of the studies presented in this thesis are described. When writing a PhD thesis, the goal of your discussion chapter is to critically examine your findings and make judgements about what you have learned.
You are going to tell your readers what your findings may mean, how they are valuable, and why.