Classical liberals believe that individuals are "egoistic, coldly calculating, essentially inert and atomistic"  and that society is no more than the sum of its individual members. These beliefs were complemented by a belief that laborers could be best motivated by financial incentive. This belief led to the passage of the Poor Law Amendment Actwhich limited the provision of social assistance, based on the idea that markets are the mechanism that most efficiently leads to wealth. Adopting Thomas Robert Malthus 's population theory, they saw poor urban conditions as inevitable, they believed population growth would outstrip food production and they regarded that consequence desirable because starvation would help limit population growth.
Thus, in general this is a disheartening display for the future of freedom. But it necessarily leaves some interesting questions unexplored.
In those terms, quite a few social consernatives don't mind that much what other people do but do want to be left alone in their own convictions. They are theatened by the program of the left to force radical views about sexuality on everyone else, suing businessesfor instance, where Christians will not provide services for gay weddings, or requiring that women's bathrooms be open to anatomical males with a female "gender identity.
The vote here therefore may represent a backlash, not so much against "gay rights" as against using such rights to destroy the freedom of others. There is a similar question down in the lower left "liberal" quadrant.
Not all liberal socialist people agree with the aggressive anti-Christian program. Bernie Sanders condemns the attacks on free speech at American colleges.
However, Bernie is out of step with his university brain trust, and his own previous love of Cuba and the Soviet Union leaves us wondering about his honesty. Also, it is unlikely that Bernie would excuse Christians from providing services for Satanic rites, i.
When Indiana tried to protect religious liberty, and when North Carolina prohibited anatomical males from using women's restrooms, the media firestorm was intense and merciless.
Again, the press never asks conservative or observant Muslims what they think -- unless, of course, it is to solicit some anti-American or "Islamophobia" grievance statement. After all this, one may harbor the suspicion that the dominant opinion at lower left is just what conservatives have understood, that it is intolerant of religious people observing the moral restrictions of their religion -- unless they are Muslims.
We might also wonder about the meaning of the upper left quadrant. This is the area of the least freedom both personally and economically. The form of the analysis for the diagram may have confused the meaning on this point. People who say they are socially liberal, but are intolerant of religious people, and in general believe in a police state to enforce their "tolerant" ideology, belong in the upper left quadrant, not the lower left.
Similarly, religious people who are conservative in their own lives, but who are actually tolerant of other poeple governing their own lives as they wish, may actually belong in the libertarian quadrant. The quadrant of least freedom has always been proper, at its extreme, to totalitarian ideologies.
While the farcical "Resistance" to Donald Trump portrays him as a fascist and themselves as anti-fascist, the rioting anarchist and communist students at Berkeley are clearly the equivalent of Fascist black shirts the dress of the anarachists or Nazi brown shirts.
In short, they are the fascists.
And this is widely recognized across the political spectrum, except on the sympathetic far left. Yet Trump, like many of the conservative Republicans, believes in Protectionist and anti-trade measures. This probably accounts for most of the Republican voters in the upper left quadrant.IN WATCHING the flow of events over the past decade or so, it is hard to avoid the feeling that something very fundamental has happened in world history.
Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties under the rule of law with an emphasis on economic urbanagricultureinitiative.comy related to economic liberalism, it developed in the early 19th century, building on ideas from the previous century as a response to urbanization and to the Industrial Revolution in .
Nov 20, · It is a truism that America has become a more diverse country. It is also a beautiful thing to watch. Visitors from other countries, particularly those having trouble incorporating different.
Jul 17, · Feature. George Soros Bet Big on Liberal Democracy. Now He Fears He Is Losing. His enemies paint him as all-powerful, but the billionaire philanthropist believes that his political legacy has.
The administration won’t defend workers and the Court has sanctified forced arbitration. But states and cities can create new ways for workers to safeguard their rights. “Suicide of the West,” subtitled “An Essay on the Meaning and Destiny of Liberalism,” is a classic work of political science, now fifty years old.