Posted on July 9, by curryja Comments by Judith Curry The Internet has introduced a golden age of ill-informed arguments. Unfortunately, the very wiring of our brains ensures that all these lively debates only make us dumber and more narrow-minded.
Bioethics Discussion Blog What have you been reading, hearing or TV viewing that has provoked some feelings of comfort or concern about what is happening in the world of medicine, medical care, treatment or science?
Ethics is all about doing the right thing.
Are you aware of any issues in medicine or biologic science which are being done right, could be improved or in fact represent totally unethical behavior? Write about them here.
Volume 91 There currently is discussion as to exactly or inexactly what is the topic of this thread which has been published Volume after Volume for 13 years. And whether there is a need to make the title of this thread more appropriate to the content that actually has been already published here.
As Moderator, I agree that the discussions and documentations here are far more broad in terms of the patient-medical system relationship than the simple "Patient Modesty" title represents. The problem is deciding how to express the title of content most appropriately, particularly for the new visitors to this bioethics thread.
I think it is of value to reproduce here the view of a faithful contributor to the blog and this thread whose identification is "Banterings" and my response as presented at the end of Volume I think it is then important to continue the discussion of the meaning of this thread and the consensus of the contents and ethics meaning of the many posting contributions over the years here.
Banterings last posting follows after my published suggestion for a title. Isn't this precisely what is the theme presented over and over here? Not only are they too modest, now they are "expecting respect.
If you come to a teaching hospital, it is understood that you will be treated like a warm cadaver. Students will line up to practice their "probing" skills on you This is "victim blaming," plain and simple. In this era of the MeToo movement, the last thing that one would want to do is victim blaming.
If we want to be brutally honest, then title the thread exactly what it is:Diabetes Timeline Spy on your competition. Small dirty trick is actually my much loved. Make a list with your top 10 competitors on line.
color, or imprint of your prescription or OTC drug. Our pill identification tool will display pictures that you can compare to your pill.
Get Started. My Medicine There are a lot of little tricks we. pathways (ask a philosopher) Ask a Philosopher: Questions and Answers 12 (1st series) led us into meaningless doublespeak and another example of the use of grammatical tricks to save us facing deeper issues?
More generally is it reasonable to say that a key task in philosophy, a key element in any definition of philosophy, is the rooting.
Sabotage by Fallacy: just start using logical fallacies and dirty tricks.
Small dirty trick is actually my most wanted. Make a list with your top 10 competitors on the web. These websites rank great for the search so they must be doing something precisely. Critical Thinking Assignment short Essay This Critical Thinking assignment is designed to provide you experience analyzing editorials for fallacies or "dirty tricks" used to win an argument. Reference a daily or Sunday edition of a newspaper, or use the online New York Times, and look for examples of at least 5 fallacies. What Is a Straw Man Argument? I always think of the Straw Man from The Wizard of Oz, but that's not the real origin. In its simplest definition, straw man is the name of a logical fallacy, which means that if you carefully dissect the argument or statement, it doesn't make sense.
Your opponent obviously doesn't care, and if your audience also doesn't care, it's not a debate: it's a cage match and the best fighter wins. The dirty secret of critical thinking instruction, which everyone knows if they’ve done it for a while, is that while logic and argument analysis are necessary components of effective critical thinking, they aren’t sufficient, not by a long shot.
Your goal should be to recognize fallacies for what they are — the dirty tricks of those who want to gain an advantage. Fallacies are therefore stratagems for gaining influence, advantage, and power (over the sheep of society). Marcos revisionism – (Part II) Half-truths and fallacies of Marcos.
Posted by chemrock on November 4, Half-truths and fallacies of Marcos” And we could see that even members of his family are now enjoying the fruits of the dirty labor of the patriarch who was accorded full military honors by one of their ilk as if he was the.